Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From snpe
Subject Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc
Date
Msg-id 200209100408.01875.snpe@snpe.co.yu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 03:05 am, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, snpe wrote:
> > On Monday 09 September 2002 11:03 pm, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 17:04, snpe wrote:
> > > > I'm use 'autocommit=false' and have problem with psql
> > > > When any commnad is lost, then next commnad get error for
> > > > transactions (simple select command).BTW
> > > >
> > > > snpe> select * from org_ba;
> > > > ERROR: relation org_ba does not exists
> > > > snpe> select * from org_ban;
> > > > ERROR: current transactions is aborted, queries ignored until end of
> > > > transaction block
> > > > snpe> rollback;
> > > > ROLLBACK
> > > > snpe> select * from org_ban;
> > >
> > > Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't that the expected behaviour when
> > > autocommit is turned off?
> >
> > I get this every time.When exists command with error next command don't
> > work without explicit rollback and commit (this is not for psql, this
> > error get in with JDeveloper - JDBC driver).When autocommit=ture all is
> > fine
>
> It starts a transaction, failes the first command and goes into the
> error has occurred in this transaction state.  Seems like reasonable
> behavior.
Select command don't start transaction - it is not good
Error command don't start transaction - nothing hapen, only typing error

regards
haris peco



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Script to compute random page cost
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue