Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Date
Msg-id 200209100213.g8A2DKu03363@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue  (Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>)
Responses Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue  (Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Steve Howe wrote:
> Because the affected commands are supposed to give you back
> information on what your INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE commands, not what is
> making behind the scenes.
> 
> And it seems that other people in the thread agree with me, please
> read thread.
> 
> Since you are probably very familiar with the rules system, why don't
> you vote on a proposal too, or just suggest yours. Your opinion is
> very important. I'm not saying I'm the truth owner; I'm just another
> developer who needs a feature working again.

Jan actually did vote in the first round which appears in TODO.detail. 
He voted that if the INSTEAD rule had only _one_ statement, return that,
if not, return nothing.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc