On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> So my take is that anything that needs initdb doesn't get in after
> beta1, unless it's a "must fix" bug. What have we got in the queue
> that would require system catalog changes?
Agreed, but, have we ever done such when it *wasn't* required? I know in
the past its always been with hestitation that such has been done, or at
least that is how I've felt it come across ...
