Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Enbom
Subject Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Date
Msg-id 20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> OK, patch attached.  It was actually easier than I thought.  We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
> 
> Regression tests pass.  No doc updates yet.

Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax. 

-- M

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
Date:
Subject: Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735
Next
From: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP"
Date:
Subject: tell Bugtraq about 7.2.2