Re: Proposed GUC Variable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Date
Msg-id 200208272317.g7RNHar24970@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed GUC Variable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
OK, just go with a boolean and admins can decide if they want it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu> writes:
> > I agree that a 'trimmed' query is likely to be useless, but the idea of
> > printing the query on ERROR is a big win for me:
> 
> Certainly.  I think though that an on-or-off GUC option is sufficient.
> We don't need a length, and we definitely don't need code to strip out
> whitespace as Bruce was suggesting ...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] fix for palloc() of user-supplied length
Next
From: ngpg@grymmjack.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed GUC Variable