Re: (yet) more buffer paranoia - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: (yet) more buffer paranoia
Date
Msg-id 200208240439.g7O4dQV25287@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: (yet) more buffer paranoia  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: (yet) more buffer paranoia  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
I guess the question is where there are tons more.  If not, I think it
would be wise to just clean it up so any future uses will look out of
place.  Can someone check on this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > This patches replaces a few more usages of strcpy() and sprintf() when
> > copying into a fixed-size buffer (in this case, a buffer of
> > NAMEDATALEN bytes). AFAICT nothing to worry about here, but worth
> > fixing anyway...
>
> I'm not that eager to replace every single sprintf with snprintf.
> Most of these are obviously safe and do not need the clutter and
> extra cycles...
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: (yet) more buffer paranoia
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: (yet) more buffer paranoia