On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > Anything in contrib that can be built seperately from the server code,
> > > > that just requires libpq and headers, should be pulled and distributed as
> > > > seperate modules, which has the added benefit that, if listed on GBorg,
> > > > search engines will pick up the modules ...
> > > >
> > > > And the whole arg that someone threw out about 'nobody maintaining them if
> > > > they aren't part of the distribution' ... so? if nobody is maintaining,
> > > > then who is using??
> > >
> > > Want to hear something funny? They are moving my pgmonitor off gborg
> > > and into the pgaccess. When the move is final, I will add a link on
> > > that gborg page.
> >
> > Ah, so now if I want to use pgmonitor, I have to use pgaccess? guess that
> > is one way to sell pgaccess to the masses *shrug*
>
> They are moving pgaccess more into the admin role, and pgmonitor fit in
> with that.
Personally, I kinda like to be able to run admin modularized ... they
*should* be looking at stuff like webmin, where you can plug-n-play admin
functions as required, or horde (http://www.horde.org) ... why would I
install pgaccess if all I want to do is monitor? Now, to be able to
install pgaccess and have pgmonitor tie into *that* would be cool ...
'bigger is better' is MicroSloth's philosophy ... sounds like the PgAccess
guys are adopting it too? :(
