Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src
Date
Msg-id 20020813022058.G35100-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13 Aug 2002, Greg Copeland wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 23:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > OK, seeing as no one voted, and only Tom and I objected originally, we
> > > will keep the code as Thomas has applied it, namely that PGXLOG/-X is
> > > recognized by initdb, postmaster, postgres, and pg_ctl.
> >
> > We will?  It looks to me like Thomas lost the vote 2-to-1.
> >
> > Unless there are more votes, I'm going to *insist* that this code be
> > changed.  It's dangerous and offers no offsetting benefit.  XLOG
> > location should be settable at initdb, noplace later.
> >
>
>
> I think Tom is on to something here.  I meant to ask but never got
> around to it.  Why would anyone need to move the XLOG after you've
> inited the db?

I just determined that disk I/O is terrible, so want to move the XLOG over
to a different file system that is currently totally idle ...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/tcop/postgres.cbacke