Table design question... - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Joerg Hessdoerfer
Subject Table design question...
Date
Msg-id 200208060921.LAA20528@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-sql
Hi, all!

Ok, I've banged my head on this, and would like to hear some opinion from the 
list (I'm just short of trying it, though I don't have the hardware yet).

We have along running data logging application, where we essentially get data 
records at varying speeds from a facility.
The data can be treated as arrays of floats, arrays of strings or binary 
dumps, where each element in the arrays represent one value.
Additionally, there is the possibility of having a varying number of 
'multisampler' values in one packet, where each value itself is an array. 
Note, that in one packet the arrays need not be of same length!

So, this gives me at least 2 tables for the data, one that can handle the 
'scalar' data (float, string, binary) and one that needs an array for every 
value (floats only).

All data will have two time stamps (facility and receive times), as data may 
be sent off-line to the logger.

So, all this boils down to the simple question: Is it better (in terms of 
indices) to have a seperate table for the time stamps and join the data to it 
via an foreign key id field, or have both timestamps in each data table?
What if I would create more data tables? 

Please keep in mind, that I expect to have multi-million records in each 
table ;-)

Thx,Joerg
-- 
Leading SW developer  - S.E.A GmbH
Mail: joerg.hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com
WWW:  http://www.sea-gmbh.com



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: "Julian Scarfe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Concatenate aggregate?
Next
From: Joerg Hessdoerfer
Date:
Subject: Re: Table design question...