Re: index and sequence name length limit? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: index and sequence name length limit?
Date
Msg-id 200208042333.51541.list-pgsql-general@empires.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to index and sequence name length limit?  (Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>)
List pgsql-general
I believe that this question relates to a discussion on -hackers, in which
they are deciding how large to allow the names to be. It looks like the next
release will allow either 64 or 128 characters.

Eventually, I think there are plans to make it a true variable length type for
efficiency and flexibility. I don't think that it will make the next release,
however (7.3).

Regards,
    Jeff Davis



On Sunday 04 August 2002 08:41 pm, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> What is the limit on the length of a index or sequence's name?
>
> I have some table with long names and I find it confusing when pgsql
> truncates the table name when creating indexes or sequences (for serials).
>
> Why does such a limit exist? I would think that since there are
> virtually no limits on the size of data that a table or column can hold
> there should be no limit on the length of names assigned to
> tables/sequences/indexes/etc ... or if that a limit would be rather long
> (say 256 characters?).
>
> Jc
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Brown-Bayliss
Date:
Subject: Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report
Next
From: Oliver Elphick
Date:
Subject: Re: saving a view with pg_dump