Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered
Date
Msg-id 200208040322.g743MrS26717@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to CLUSTER and indisclustered  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom, should we be updating that flag after we CLUSTER instead of
> > requiring an ANALYZE after the CLUSTER?
> 
> Could do that I suppose, but I'm not super-excited about it.  ANALYZE is
> quite cheap these days (especially in comparison to CLUSTER ;-)).  I'd
> settle for a note in the CLUSTER docs that recommends a subsequent
> ANALYZE --- this seems no different from recommending ANALYZE after bulk
> data load or other major update of a table.

OK.  I am sure it is not obvious to people to ANALYZE because the data
in their table hasn't changed, just the ordering.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: getpid() function