Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 200208030117.g731HCU08596@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
Responses Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=16:
> > > (average = 28.6 seconds)
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=32:
> > > (average = 29.15 seconds)
> 
> That is almost a 2 percent cost. Shall we challenge someone to get us
> back 2 percent from somewhere before the 7.3 release? Optimizing a hot
> spot might do it...

I wasn't terribly concerned because this wasn't a 2% on normal workload
test, it was a 2% bang on function calls as fast as you can test.
--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates