On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > OK, I have attached a patch for testing. Sample output is:
> > >
> > > $ sql -U guest test
> > > psql: FATAL: user "test.guest" does not exist
> > > $ createuser test.guest
> >
> > I will object to any scheme that makes any characters in the user name
> > magic. Two reasons: First, do it right, make a separate column.
> > Second, several tools use URI syntax to specify data sources. This will
> > break any feature that relies on being able to put special characters into
> > the user name.
> >
> > The right solution to having database-local user names is putting extra
> > information into pg_shadow regarding which database this user applies to.
> > It could be an array or some separate "authentication domain" thing.
>
> OK, if you object, you can say goodbye to this feature for 7.3. I can
> supply the patch to Marc and anyone else who wants it but I am not
> inclined nor convinced we need that level of work for this feature.
>
> So we end up with nothing.
Stupid qustion .. but why can't you just add a 'domain' column to
pg_passwd/pg_shadow so that its stored as two fields instead of one?
Which I believe is what Pter is/was suggesting ...
