On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > *Eventually*, a simple checkout of 'pgsql' should result in a "server
> > only" distribution that we can pull bits and pieces into transparently ...
>
> I'm still not quite sure where this is headed or why, but if nothing
> else pgsql could and should be the whole thing, and pgsql-server could
> be the server subset. Server-only makes sense for only some users, and
> nothing apparently makes sense for everyone. But we may as well have the
> old names do the old things...
will make those changes in the morning ...
