Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Date
Msg-id 200207310315.g6V3FXH24083@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?  (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>)
Responses Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?  (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > You can add children without modifying your code.  It is classic C++
> > inheritance;  parent table accesses work with the new child tables
> > automatically.
> 
> I don't see how my method doesn't do this as well. What code do you have
> to modify in the relational way of doing things that you don't in this
> inheritance way?

Seems like you have to modify your views to handle this, at least in the
example you just posted, right?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL file location