Tom Lane wrote:
> hyldgaard@hotmail.com (Thomas Hyldgaard) writes:
> > As I can read from other appends then the behaviour where transactions
> > are aborted if errors occur is "working as designed" in PostgreSQL.
> > I'm using PostgreSQL 7.2. Is this something that will be changed in a
> > later version of PostgreSQL?
>
> Maybe someday, but it's not just around the corner.
Yes, nested transactions/savepoints is what we need.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
