Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruno, Tom,
>
> > Typo. I meant to say columns. The issue is that max doesn't use an index,
> > but if there are a lot of different values of G for a given A, B and C,
> > it may be better to use an index then to search through the applicable
> > rows to find the maximum.
>
> That's odd ... you're correct. Tom, why doesn't MAX() use an index? I
> understand why indexes are generally useless for SUM(), AVG, and COUNT, but
> it seems that MAX() and MIN() should *always* use an index.
Index access methods don't know about aggregates, and our type system
makes such linkage difficult. The FAQ does have: However, <SMALL>LIMIT</SMALL> combined with <SMALL>ORDER
BY</SMALL> often will use an index because only a small portion of the table is returned. In fact, though MAX()
andMIN() don't use indexes, it is possible to retrieve such values using an index with ORDER BY and LIMIT:<PRE>
SELECT col FROM tab ORDER BY col [ DESC ] LIMIT 1</PRE>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
