On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:30:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> My opinion on this point is (a) pgxactlock locks are special and should
> be shown specially --- in the form of "xact a waits for xact b";
Not sure how that would fit into a UI based on returning sets of tuples.
> I can fathom no reason at all that anyone would have
> the slightest use for a displayer that arbitrarily omits some locks.
I agree. I think a reasonable solution is to have the low-level SRF
return data on both pg_xactlock locks and locks on system catalogs.
If the DBA wants to disregard one or the other, it should be pretty
easy to do (particularly pg_xactlock).
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
