Re: [SQL] line datatype - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [SQL] line datatype
Date
Msg-id 200207161521.g6GFL5417443@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] line datatype  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> > The issue is in choosing an external format for LINE which does not lose
> > precision during dump/reload.
> 
> Why is this any worse for LINE than for any of the other geometric
> types (or for plain floats, for that matter)?
> 
> We do need a solution for exact dump/reload of floating-point data,
> but I don't see why the lack of it should be reason to disable access
> to the LINE type.

I don't understand why dumping the two point values isn't sufficient.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_views.definition
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] line datatype