Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> > For all intent and purpose, pg_index.indisprimary can be added to that
> > list. Can't make a primary key without a pg_constraint entry.
>
> I disagree. For one thing, there are clients that look at that column.
> There's no percentage in breaking them to gain zero (and it will be
> zero, because of alignment considerations...)
Yes, pgaccess uses it, as I remember. Would be nice if it was accurate.
>
> indisclustered is currently pretty useless, but may become less so
> if CLUSTER gets upgraded to usefulness, so I'm not in favor of deleting
> that either.
Yea, I can see that being useful some day.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
