Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?) - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)
Date
Msg-id 200207050239.g652dU822949@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Tom Lane wrote:
> Even uglier cases occur if some other connection has also created
> a temp table named foo.  You should *not* see that in \d ... but
> you will.
> 
> > I will mark the TODO as done.
> 
> It's not really done, but the remaining fixes will fall out of making
> psql schema-aware.

The original bug is gone.  We just have new ones.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 




pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)
Next
From: juerg.rietmann@pup.ch
Date:
Subject: sql statement how to do ?