Re: 2 Selects 1 is faster, why? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Masaru Sugawara
Subject Re: 2 Selects 1 is faster, why?
Date
Msg-id 20020627234531.7ECB.RK73@sea.plala.or.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2 Selects 1 is faster, why?  (Alvar Freude <alvar@a-blast.org>)
List pgsql-sql
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:34:47 +0200
Alvar Freude <alvar@a-blast.org> wrote:


> Hi,
> 
> -- Eric <emayo@pozicom.net> wrote:
> 
> > If I perform the following 2 selects, the first one is EXTREMELY slow
> > where the 2nd one is very fast.
> 
> [...] 
> 
> > Why would 2 be so much faster?  I have ran the EXPLAIN on this and index
> > scans are being used.
> 
> I guess, the first query has to search for all ol.orderid the equivalent
> o.orderid; the second variant only has to search for '1234' in each
> ?.orderid, which is much faster.

You are right. And this type of optimising are not yet implemented.Tom said it in the prior discussions. 



Regards,
Masaru Sugawara






pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CHECK clause doesn't work with CASE clause
Next
From: Richard Poole
Date:
Subject: Re: CHECK clause doesn't work with CASE clause