Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Date
Msg-id 200206242133.g5OLXhl26908@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Does anyone know what the major barriers to infinite log replay are in
> >> PostgreSQL? I'm trying to look for everything that might need to be
> >> changed outside xlog.c, but surely this has come up before. Searching
> >> the archives hasn't revealed much.
> 
> > This has been brought up.  Could we just save WAL files and get replay? 
> > I believe some things have to be added to WAL to allow this, but it
> > seems possible.
> 
> The Red Hat group has been looking at this somewhat; so far there seem
> to be some minor tweaks that would be needed, but no showstoppers.


Good.

> > Somehow you would need a tar-type
> > backup of the database, and with a running db, it is hard to get a valid
> > snapshot of that.
> 
> But you don't *need* a "valid snapshot", only a correct copy of
> every block older than the first checkpoint in your WAL log series.
> Any inconsistencies in your tar dump will look like repairable damage;
> replaying the WAL log will fix 'em.

Yes, my point was that you need physical file backups, not pg_dump, and
you have to be tricky about the files changing during the backup.  You
_can_ work around changes to the files during backup.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 
/usr/local/bin/mime: cannot create /dev/ttyp3: permission denied




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in the Debian way
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PERFORM effects FOUND patch (Was: [GENERAL] I must be