Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I'd really like to fix this and make the ODBC compile the default so we
> > can get more testing.
>
> Is it possible to do that, considering the ODBC compile depends on
> having ODBC software present?
>
> I didn't object to expecting readline and zlib to be present by default,
> but I'm not happy about expecting ODBC stuff to be present by default.
> That seems too far off the beaten path.
I have no odbc here at all and have always compiled odbc to check for
patch errors. You need ODBC to test the software, but not for compile.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
