Re: SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to MySQL
Date
Msg-id 200206191643.g5JGh4D10793@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to MySQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Self <jself@nngov.com> writes:
> > if it's too OT, let me know, and I'll stop. The query "SELECT authuser,
> > SUM(bytes) AS traffic FROM logfile GROUP BY authuser ORDER BY traffic"
> > [is slow]
> 
> What datatype are the columns used in the query?  And what PG version
> are we talking about?

My guess is that is the lack of hashing for GROUP BY aggregating that is
killing us.  TODO has:
* Add hash for evaluating GROUP BY aggregates

and I specifically remember MySQL has such a hash. The big question is
how many unique values are there in the group.  If it is large, the
missing hashing could be the problem.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Steve Wampler
Date:
Subject: Tagging rows into collections?
Next
From: Michael Agbaglo
Date:
Subject: syntax for access an alias in the where clause ?