Re: ecpg and bison again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: ecpg and bison again
Date
Msg-id 20020619073649.GE2783@feivel.credativ.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ecpg and bison again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ecpg and bison again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:41:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> > How about we add the preproc.c file generated by bison 1.49 to cvs?
> > Could that create problems elsewhere? 
> 
> Yes.  It's a bad idea to put derived files in CVS.  For one thing,
> CVS will not guarantee that their timestamps are right compared to
> the master file.

Actually I thought about changing the makefile as well, so preproc.c
does not look like a derived file anymore.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG won't compile anymore
Next
From: "Tony Griffiths(RA)"
Date:
Subject: Missing library files??