Re: GUC option log_pid is not checked [Fwd: Bug#149675: - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: GUC option log_pid is not checked [Fwd: Bug#149675:
Date
Msg-id 200206140513.g5E5DoR04780@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC option log_pid is not checked [Fwd: Bug#149675:  (Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
List pgsql-patches
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Oliver Elphick wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 15:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:
> > > The GUC option log_pid is not checked; LOG_PID is used by default,
> > > contrary to the documentation.  This patch fixes it.
> >
> > No it doesn't (at least not unless you are also going to propose closing
> > and reopening syslog at SIGHUP to deal with changes in log_pid setting).
>
> ... partially fixes it :-(
>
> > I'm not convinced that there's anything wrong with the code anyway.
> > Do you expect log_timestamp to control whether timestamps are added to
> > syslog entries?  If so you are out of luck.  Perhaps we should just
>
> syslog() recognises LOG_PID as a flag to request logging of PIDs; there
> is no equivalent for the timestamp, of course.
>
> > tweak the documentation to make it clearer that log_pid and
> > log_timestamp only control the format of non-syslog logging.
>
> OK.
>
> If that is its real purpose, I think both I and the original submitter
> misunderstood the intention of this parameter, which certainly doesn't
> distinguish between logs via syslog and messages to the log file:
>
>     LOG_PID (boolean)
>
>     Prefixes each server log message with the process ID of the backend
>     process. This is useful to sort out which messages pertain to which
>     connection. The default is off.
>
>
> Perhaps that should read:
>
>
>     LOG_PID (boolean)
>
>     Prefixes each server message in the logfile with the process ID of
>     the backend process. This is useful to sort out which messages
>     pertain to which connection. The default is off.  This parameter
>     does not affect messages logged via syslog(), which always contain
>     the process ID.
>
> I don't actually consider it a good thing to omit the PID in syslog, so
> I am happy that this change is not necessary, provided that the
> distinction between syslog and logfile is made clear.
>
> --
> Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
> Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
> GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
>
>      "And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou
>       comest into thy kingdom. And Jesus said unto him,
>       Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me
>       in paradise."       Luke 23:42,43
-- End of PGP section.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: WriteBuffer return value
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit