Tom Lane wrote:
> rmurray@debian.org writes:
> > If performance is important, I doubt people will be using a MIPS1
> > platform without ll/sc. Any sane chip today, if it only complies with
> > MIPS1 tends to have ll/sc as well. It is this case of a mostly MIPS1 chip
> > that also implements ll/sc that can have the performance benefits of using
> > the opcodes passed along.
>
> Hm. Okay, that's a fair argument. I'll leave it be ...
OK, what did we decide on this change?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
