Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,
Date
Msg-id 20020611063308.P11817-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > 2. Once Branch created, any *partially implemented* features will get
> >    rip'd out of the -STABLE branch and only fixes to the existing, fully
> >    implement features will go in
>
> Now, that is an interesting idea.

Ya, I thought it was when you -and- Tom proposed it :)

I quote from a message on June 8th:

=======================
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > So, I we should:
> >     Warn people in July that beta is September 1 and all features
> >     have to be complete by then, or they get ripped out.
>
> I thought that was more or less the same thing I was proposing...
========================






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp/Interval proposals: Part 2
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp/Interval proposals: Part 2