Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, I have had to apply this additional patch to fix a fmgr.c failure.
> Would someone please verify that the additional columns I added have the
> correct values. I think this was needed because there were other
> changes to include/catalog/pg_proc.h in this area.
>
OK, I am also seeing this failure on the opr_sanity checks. I can't
figure out whether it is OK that a unknown conversion function fails
this test.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
*** ./expected/opr_sanity.out Fri Apr 12 21:33:24 2002
--- ./results/opr_sanity.out Tue Apr 23 23:48:18 2002
***************
*** 198,205 ****
(p1.pronargs = 2 AND p1.proargtypes[0] = prorettype AND
p1.proargtypes[1] = 23)));
oid | proname
! -----+---------
! (0 rows)
-- **************** pg_operator ****************
-- Look for illegal values in pg_operator fields.
--- 198,207 ----
(p1.pronargs = 2 AND p1.proargtypes[0] = prorettype AND
p1.proargtypes[1] = 23)));
oid | proname
! -----+------------
! 109 | unknownin
! 110 | unknownout
! (2 rows)
-- **************** pg_operator ****************
-- Look for illegal values in pg_operator fields.
======================================================================
