Re: Thank you ! Re: Is there any Faster workaround ?? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Roberto Mello
Subject Re: Thank you ! Re: Is there any Faster workaround ??
Date
Msg-id 20020415152329.GA18325@cc.usu.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Optimizer for IN (..) ? / Re: Thank you ! Re: Is there any Faster workaround ??  (Bernd von den Brincken <bvdb@asa.de>)
List pgsql-sql
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Bernd von den Brincken wrote:

> >> > everyone knows "IN" is pain fully slow currently in pgsql
> >> > is the any fster alternative to above query
> 
> Yes this question was posted before - and if so, and if the answer is so 
> simple - would it not make sense to implement this wisdom in the optimizer?

The IN construct is slow in Oracle and probably other RDBMSs too. I don't
know if the PostgreSQL implementation is any slower than others (I don't
think it is).

-Roberto
-- 
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu/ USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+ Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU -
http://www.brasileiro.net/      http://www.sdl.usu.edu/ - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer    
 
The more things change, the more they stay the same.


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How slow is DISTINCT?
Next
From: "Josh Berkus"
Date:
Subject: Re: data order problem