Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Date
Msg-id 200203260509.g2Q59bG07229@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> >> Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks
> >> clean, sizes all look right ...
> 
> > ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3.
> 
> On the subject of contained documentation, I notice
> 
> *** postgresql-7.2.1/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml    Mon Mar 18 18:04:11 2002
> --- REL7_2/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml    Thu May 10 21:46:33 2001
> ***************
> *** 3,7 ****
>   documentation.  In text, use for example &version; to refer to them.
>   -->
>   
> ! <!entity version "7.2.1">
> ! <!entity majorversion "7.2.1">
> --- 3,7 ----
>   documentation.  In text, use for example &version; to refer to them.
>   -->
>   
> ! <!entity version "7.2">
> ! <!entity majorversion "7.2">
> 
> Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2?  Right offhand
> the latter seems correct ...

I wasn't sure what to do here.  I figured if the docs were regenerated,
it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...