Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Date
Msg-id 200203120004.g2C04OG08515@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts  ("Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron@the-infinite.org>)
Responses Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
List pgsql-patches
I am just guessing what people will think about the patch.  If people
want it is a good idea, I can apply it.

The patch basically takes:

    sort +1 -0 and changes it to

and makes it:

    sort +1 -0 || sort -k 1,0

or something like that.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dominic J. Eidson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Paul Eggert wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
> > > > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:05:17 -0500 (EST)
> > > >
> > > > This is an interesting patch, but have not heard anyone else have this
> > > > problem
> > >
> > > That's not surprising, since I am purposely running a bleeding-edge
> > > system to test PostgreSQL portability.  Nobody is shipping POSIX
> > > 1003.1-2001 systems yet (the standard was only approved in December by
> > > the IEEE, and it will not be an official ISO standard for a few more
> > > weeks yet).  But when they do, you will run into this problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > > and am hesitant to add more cost to fix something that may not be
> > > > broken.  Sorry.
>
> Apparently it _is_ broken - Paul wouldn't be submitting a patch if it
> wasn't. Duh.
>
> > > There is no cost to PostgreSQL in normal operation, since that part of
> > > the source isn't affected at all.  All that is affected is some of the
> > > test scripts and documentation.  I see little risk to incorporating
> > > the patch, but of course it's your decision.
> >
> > We are kind of picky about adding complexity when it isn't required.
>
> s/isn't/isn't yet
>               ^^^
> So you'd prefer to just wait 'till POSIX 1003.1-2001 systems ship?
>
> <sarcasm>
> Paul, I guess you should set up an at(1) job to resubmit the patch in a
> couple-3 years, or something...
> </sarcasm>
>
>
> --
> Dominic J. Eidson
>                                         "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.the-infinite.org/              http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
>
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Dominic J. Eidson"
Date:
Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts