Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Date
Msg-id 200203112055.g2BKtM428341@saturn.janwieck.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Greg Copeland wrote:
>
> Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > I'm looking through the index code and just happened to notice that
> > INDEX_MAX_KEYS is currently set to 16.  It there a reason for this value
> > to be at 16 or was it arbitrarily specified?
>
> Arbitrary, and there is discussion about increasing it.
   Wasn't it that this number had to be <= the maximum number of   function args?


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Do FROM items of different schemas conflict?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS