Re: Duration of beta period - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Duration of beta period
Date
Msg-id 200202241251.g1OCpBH12119@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Duration of beta period  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > It was a good period, but we were in beta longer than we were in
> > development.  That isn't good, and I think we could have shortened it if
> > we had pushed people to test beta sooner and harder, avoided some
> > sideroads in improving things that could have waited for 7.3, and pushed
> > a few people to complete bug fixes quicker than letting it all wait
> > until the end of beta.  Of course, I may be wrong.  :-)
> 
> Where this a commercial product, your assessments would be correct ...
> but, alas, we aren't ... "pushing ppl" that are doing something because
> they enjoy it, and receive no compensation for it, is a very effective way
> of driving good ppl away ...

I see no problem in asking people for a date when they will complete
certain things, especially if everyone is waiting for them during beta. 
If the date comes and nothing happens, we can ask them for a new date. 
If the date is too far away, we can figure on another plan.  I agree
pressure is totally wrong, but asking for an estimate of completion
seems reasonable, and setting a date when we hope to be done may
encourage people to get started earlier.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: phone