Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > We could support keywords DELIMITER and DELIMITERS and only document
> > > > the first one.
> > >
> > > One could also argue that it should be WITH DELIMITER for more
> > > consistency with the other optional clauses.
> > >
> > > But let's put that in the TODO list, not try to get it done now...
> >
> > Updated TODO:
> >
> > COPY
> > ...
> > o Change syntax to WITH DELIMITER, (keep old syntax around?)
> >
>
> An attached patch implements this. The problem with implementing this is
> that the new syntax is:
>
> .... WITH DELIMITERS '<delim>' WITH NULL AS '<char>'
>
> Naturally, this leads to a shift/reduce conflict. Solution is more or less
> that used with CREATE DATABASE WITH ... WITH ... etc. The only ugly bit
> was mixing this with the old USING DELIMITERS ... syntax. I don't like the
> solution -- I get the feeling there's a better way to do it.
>
> The other option of course is to update yylex() to create a new token
> in the same way that the UNIONJOIN terminal is created. But I think this
> is a bit messy.
>
> Ideas or is this okay?
>
> Gavin
Content-Description:
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
