go to town :)
On 15 Feb 2002, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> I just got a question originating from our lawyers at work, concerning
> the usage of 'free software' in our product.
>
> The product (currently) consists of a modified Redhat 7.1 distribution,
> PostgreSQL 7.1.3 (in custom RPM packages) and some proprietary softwares.
>
> I read the license, and saw this paragraph:
>
> use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without
> a written agreement is hereby granted
>
> We're charging for the SYSTEM (ie, hardware and software combination)
> which contains and have PostgreSQL as a fundamental part of the whole
> system and function.
>
> We're not charging SPECIFICALLY for PostgreSQL, but for a complete, working
> setup... Is this in conformance with the PostgreSQL license...?
>
>
> Ortega counter-intelligence pits security Treasury Serbian smuggle
> Mossad [Hello to all my fans in domestic surveillance] Delta Force
> iodine South Africa Marxist Nazi tritium
> [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
