Andy Marden wrote:
> I'm just coming at this from the point of view of someone who's
> implementing PostgreSQL for the first time, but has in-depth
> Oracle experience. This is the one area left where organisations
> are going to discount PostgreSQL because they can't afford to
> tell people that all data entered that day has to be re-entered
> (sorry) because of a database corruption. How slick it is
> doesn't matter initially, as long as it can reliably be done.
I totally agree. That's why it is under URGENT on the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
