Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > if I'm not mistaken, it's called partial sorting, when you stop
> > > sorting process after getting desired number of rows specified by LIMIT clause.
> > > it's extremely friendly for web applications, because 90% of users
> > > just read the first page of results. We already discussed this feature
> > > sometime during 7.1 dev and even made very crude patch. In our tests we
> > > got performance win of factor 5-6 ( getting first 100 row from 1mln ).
> > > We hope sometime we'll return to this.
> >
> > But we already have cursor's assuming 10% return. Is allowing that
> > value to be changed using SET an acceptable solution?
>
>
> Bruce, web applicationa are stateless, so forget about cursors.
> I wrote about obvious optimization which is valid for very narrow case,
> but which is widely spreaded.
I am confused. I thought we already did optimization for LIMIT that
assumed you only wanted a few values. Is there something we are missing
there? I thought the disucssion related only to people using cursors
and fetching only some of the data.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
