On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Here's an idea: look at their code to see what kind of SQL jiggery pokery
> they needed to implement it and then implement it ourselves...
I wish PostgreSQL got this functionality.
>
> BTW, from my estimates you'd need at least 4 - 6 sql queries to simulate the
> REPLACE syntax for Postgres, so why on earth would you use it?
> Chris
Why so many? It is simple enough to attempt a delete and then do an
insert.
