Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure
Date
Msg-id 20011220163618.A20551@zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:

> However, on my machine both tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh are in
> /usr/local/lib, not in the subdirectories.  Putting them in
> version-specific subdirectories seems pretty self-defeating.
> What packaging of tcl/tk did you use?
Latest unstable GNU/Linux Debian. Tcl 8.3.3-1, Tk 8.3.3-1.       Karel

-- Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz,
http://mape.jcu.cz


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcement: libpkixpq 0.1 released
Next
From: Nick Gorham
Date:
Subject: Re: long ints use for 4-byte entities in ODBC