>>>Thomas Swan said:> In keeping with some of the more modern daemons (xinetd, etc) you might > want to consider
somethinglike /etc/pgsql.d/ as a directory name. > Where as most folders with a .d contain a set of files or a
referenced> by the main config file in /etc. This is on a RedHat system, but I > think the logic applies well if you
areflexible the location of the > base system config directory. (/usr/local/etc vs /etc, etc.)
I run BSD, and I believe config files should sit in /etc if the files are not
many. We can even go with one config file, such as postgres.conf which will
include the paths to other files - that can sit anywhere - in /etc/pgsql for
example or in /usr/local/pgsql/etc.
But, let's not start religious wars whether the System V way is better than
BSD's :-)
Daniel
