Re: v7.2b3 packaged, but not announced beyond here yet ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Horst Herb
Subject Re: v7.2b3 packaged, but not announced beyond here yet ...
Date
Msg-id 20011123231759.24310.qmail@gnumed.dhs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: v7.2b3 packaged, but not announced beyond here yet ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses RPMs and regression tests (was Re: v7.2b3 packaged...)
List pgsql-hackers
On Saturday 24 November 2001 03:08, Tom Lane wrote:

> In reality, it's extremely questionable that the regression tests
> will tell anything useful to a person who's installing prebuilt
> platform-specific binaries.  The builder of the binaries should have
> run the regress tests.  So I'm not sure what the point is --- but I am
> sure that this setup will cause a lot more problems than it solves.
> I recommend forgetting about postgresql-test.

Tom,

I have problems interpreting your statement.
I assumed that the purpose of a regression test is to verify that software 
is doing what it is supposed to do on the system it as installed.

If I install a binary package, you say that I cannot rely on the 
regression test? What does the builder of the package know about the 
particularities of my system? How else could I verify the functionality of 
the installed software?

Either the regression test is construed in a way that it works with any 
installation, or users should be advised NOT to use binary packages at all 
and only install in a way that they can verify the installation with the 
regression test. How would you think any user would trust his/her 
installation in a production environment otherwise?

Did I misunderstand your statement or is my trust in PostgreSQL binary 
installations unjustified?

Horst


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: upper and lower doesn't work with german umlaut?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: RPMs and regression tests (was Re: v7.2b3 packaged...)