Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)
Date
Msg-id 200111211933.fALJXbu02748@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > I am just really concerned that the newbe PostgreSQL user will assume
> > the performance they see with the default settings are what they will
> > judge PostgreSQL.
> 
> For this kind of "newbie", the kind that doesn't read the documentation,
> this would only make it worse, because they'd assume that by making the
> choice between three default configurations they've done an adequate
> amount of tuning.  Basically, you'd exchange, "I can't find any tuning
> information, but it's slow" for "I did all the tuning and it's still
> slow".  Not a good choice.
> 
> The bottom line is that you *must* edit postgresql.conf in order to tune
> your server.  If this editing is simplified it doesn't matter what the
> default is.

Is it possible to probe the machine with and update postgresql.conf
automatically?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: beta3
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)