Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support
Date
Msg-id 200111130130.fAD1UdZ21193@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Are you saying we never need to save deferred trigger events any longer,
> > or just in this case?
>
> The only reason we save 'em beyond the time they are executed is to support
> "triggered data change" detection.

I assume we still need a queue for deferred triggers, right?  We just
now don't need to keep them after that like we used to, right?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: More FK patches