> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Seems we should increase to 24 or 32. Is there a
> > downside to the increase. I can't even imagine a performance hit.
>
> Darn if I know. We should try to measure it before assuming it's
> insignificant. At the very least, it'd increase the size of pg_proc
> by about a third ...
Doesn't it store in pg_proc as an array, which is of variable length?
I think the only overhead is adding code to fmgr.c for the extra param
combinations.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
