Re: ecpg - GRANT bug - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: ecpg - GRANT bug
Date
Msg-id 200110300650.f9U6o9G24059@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ecpg - GRANT bug  (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>)
Responses Re: ecpg - GRANT bug  (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>)
Re: ecpg - GRANT bug  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:44:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I saw that change from 8 to 7.  I think in the ecpg code that the first
> > parameter to cat_str is the number of arguments _after_ the first
> > parameter.
>
> It is indeed.
>
> > so I think the change from 8 -> 7 is correct.
>
> Not exactly. Yes, the cat_str has 7 arguments besides the number, but the
> rule suggests it should have 8.

Sorry, I am lost.  The rule above says to count the number of params
after the first one.  Doesn't that make it 7?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug #501: plpgsql, date data type and time change
Next
From: Lee Kindness
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpg - GRANT bug