Re: VARCHAR vs TEXT - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: VARCHAR vs TEXT
Date
Msg-id 200110130354.f9D3sQH01372@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VARCHAR vs TEXT  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-sql
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Aasmund Midttun Godal wrote:
> 
> > I am sure this question has been answered in some form or another
> > before, but I can't really find anything on exactly this issue.
> > 
> > Are there any differences between varchar and text other than
> > 
> > 1. varchar has limited size
> > 2. varchar is SQL 92 text is not?
> > 
> > Especially regarding performance.
> > 
> > Or am I correct to assume that if you need a place to store some text,
> > and you are not sure how much (like an email address or a name) you
> > are best off using text?
> 
> Pretty much yes.  text and varchar are pretty equivalent other than
> the fact that varchar specifies a maximum size.

I have added the following paragraph to the FAQ:
   <P>CHAR() is best when storing strings that are usually the   same length.  VARCHAR() is best when storing
variable-lengthstrings,   but you want to limit how long a string can be.  TEXT is for strings   of unlimited length,
maximum1 gigabyte.  BYTEA is for storing   binary data, particularly values that include NULL bytes.</P>
 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MEDIAN as custom aggregate?