Mule internal code ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Patrice Hédé
Subject Mule internal code ?
Date
Msg-id 20011008232023.G14587@idf.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Mule internal code ?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

As said in another mail, I have tried to add iso-8859-15 (Latin 9) &
iso-8859-16 (Latin 10) to PostgreSQL, I think I have done mostly all
that's necessary. But I miss two things :

- latin92mic/mic2latin9/latin102mic/mic2latin10 in conv.c
- the leading character value in pg_wchar.h

I don't know anything about MULE except that it's some Emacs standard
(why they didn't go for Unicode is beyond my understanding, is
off-topic on this list, and had probably some good argument at the
time).

Can someone point me to where I should look for that ? is it as easy
as iso-8859-2/3/4 support, or do I need to do something as iso-8859-5 ?

Thank you :)

Patrice.

-- 
Patrice HÉDÉ ------------------------------- patrice à islande org ----- --  Isn't it weird  how scientists  can
imagine all the matter of the
 
universe exploding out of a dot smaller than the head of a pin, but they
can't come up with a more evocative name for it than "The Big Bang" ? -- What would _you_ call the creation of the
universe? -- "The HORRENDOUS SPACE KABLOOIE !"               - Calvin and Hobbes
 
------------------------------------------ http://www.islande.org/ -----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Beta Wednesday
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Place of PO files for NLS (was Re: [PATCHES] PG_DUMP NLS (Russian))