On 07 Oct 2001 at 10:56 (-0400), Tom Lane wrote:
| It occurs to me that the real problem is not so much ALTER RENAME not
| doing enough, as it is psql doing the wrong thing. The \d display for
| indexes is almost entirely unhelpful, since it doesn't tell you such
| critical stuff as whether the index is a functional index nor which
| index opclasses are being used. I wonder whether we oughtn't rip out
| the whole display and make it report the results of pg_get_indexdef(),
| instead.
This would solve the display problem for sure, but we'd still have
bad data in the pg_attribute tuple for the index -- specifically,
attname would still contain the original column name that the index
was created on. I'm now aware that PG does not use this attname
directly/internally, but it would still be wrong if anyone happens
to look at the system catalog.
cheers. Brent
--
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman
